We’ll start off today’s EFCAUpdate with a video where Stern, President of the SEIU, says that his union has saved millions of dollars to unelectDemocrats who did not live up with their promise to vote in favor of the Employee Free Choice Act.
When will EFCA be introduced is anyone’s guess, although most agree it will be sometime in 2009. Obama and Biden think it will be on hold until the fall, and it looks like Obama’s pro-labor executive orderswere an overt act to pacify the unions for several months. In fact, Biden believes it will be done “This year. This year we hope. Our expectation is this year, this calendar year.” Thank you for your clarity, VP Biden. House Majority Leader Hoyer (D-MD) says House action won’t start until Spring or Summer. Senate Majority Reid (D-NV) said that that Senate won’t see it until the Summer. Here’s a video of Biden discussing EFCA.
The Coalition for a Democratic Workplaceconducted a straight forward, two-question survey to determine support levels for EFCA. The Ohio Employers Law Blog did a great recap of the results indicating that most people do not want EFCA. Click here to see those results.
Obamatapped New Hampshire Republican Senator Gregg to head the Department of Commerce, which meant his Senate seat needed filled. We’ve all learned about filling a Senate seat: Blago, anyone? So, it became a foregone conclusion that Gregg’s seat would be filled by a Democrat, since New Hampshire’s Governor is a Democrat. Filling Gregg’s seat with a Democrat would put the Dems at the supermajority number of 60 Senators where filibustering legislation (the Republican Senators’ defense to EFCA last time) would be impossible. Not so fast! Gregg made sure that his seat would be filled with a Republican before accepting the position with the Dept. of Commerce. So now, Bonnie Newman – someone who has never held elected office and does not have any official positions on any major issues, i.e. Employee Free Choice Act – will fill Gregg’s seat and presumably vote against EFCA. Remember, though, even with 59 Republican Senators, EFCA will likely pass since Arlen Spector (R-PA) voted in favor of it last time.
I laughed when I read that the AFL-CIO’s new video (narrated by the executive VP of the union) was intended to “cut through the deceptive campaign and give the facts about the Employee Free Choice Act.” The video has a cameo spot, too, from the executive director of the union-fronted organization American Rights at Work to “cut through the spin” of corporate America. This video is supposedly being featured at union meetings and around the country – why are they showing union members how “the system for forming unions is broken.” Seems like members of unions, who already went through the system be become unionized, wouldn’t necessarily think that the system was broken. Here’s the video:
On the anniversary of the last EFCAattempt, unions symbolically held a rally in Washington D.C. and supposedly brought with them 1.5 million signatures of people who supported the Employee Free Choice Act. Also present was Rep. George Miller (D-CA) who co-sponsored the last bill and said: “decisions aboutthe workplace belong to the worker.” Excuse me? What aboutthe owner? What aboutthe person who lives, breathes, and sleeps the business; the person who mortgaged his house to start the company; the person who risks to lose everything when the market dried up, a catastrophic injury occurs, malicious Internet press abouthis company surfaces? Since when should the workers be the ones to make the decisions about someone else’s company, Representative Miller?
Interestingly, 1 million signatures would represent 1/16 of the current total unionized workforce in America. Conversely, EFCA threatens the right to a secret ballot for 105 million Americans – well beyond the 69 million who voted in the last presidential election. If the unions could only drum up enough interest from 1 out of every 16 of their own members to sign a petition, I hardly think that EFCA is something that the public at large is interested in seeing passed in Congress. And I wonder how many of those signatures are from people who do not belong to unions. No one has (or likely will ever) challenge the purported number of signatures to make sure they are legitimate. In all, this is just a bunch of propaganda, an advertisement that will not be scrutinized, by 6% of the unionized workforce wanting us to believe that they represent the 105 million people currently working in America.
The AFL-CIO uses some “real life examples” of why employees need unions. One of them is Theresa Gares who says, “Once [her company] found out we were trying to organize a union, they started having meetings. They’re trying to talk people out of it, discourage them. This is what we’re fighting for: We’re fighting for fairness in the workplace, a voice in the workplace, things that we deserve.” Are you kidding me? Ms. Gares is the union’s marquee spokesperson and all she has to say is the company “started having meetings.” And this is the intimidation that unions claim is happening and why employees need EFCA?
LaborPains.org is always good for an entry here each week, and this week doesn’t let us down, either when highlighting who is against EFCA. Some of the more notable names include:
- George McGovern, former senator from South Dakota and the 1972 Democratic presidential candidate
- Rev. Al Sharton, American Baptist minister, political and civil rights/social justice activist, and radio talk show host
- Richard Epstein, professor of Law at the University of Chicago who says, “There is simply no legitimate government interest in promoting unionization that justifies a clandestine organizing campaign which denies all speech rights to the union’ adversaries.”
- Ariella Bernstein, former deputy director of public affairs at FMCS and a field examiner and supervisor at the NLRB who says, “I am a Democrat who has worked at both the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, two agencies that figure prominently in this legislation [Employee Free Choice Act].”
Fox Rothschild’s Employment blog out of Philadelphia set the record straight about the elimination of secret ballots when it said: “The reality is that once Unions are given the option of having the NLRB certify a union immediately upon presentation of at least a majority of union authorization cards signed by a specific unit of employees versus waiting some 40 days, whereby employees become educated during this period, and then having a secret ballot election, Unions ar going to avoid, at all cost, the election route. I mean, why do you think the Unions’ have placed so much money, time, and effort in seeing that the EFCA passes? is it because the EFCAcalls for mandatory injunctions? I think not. How about the mandatory contract arbitration? Yeah, could be, but without a certification, there can be no representative or contract for that matter. So, there is no “misinformation” being spread – just realty, which is that once a “card-check” certification is in place, the secret ballot election may die.”
This former “rank and file” employee enlightens people as to what it’s like to work a union job when he says: “As a young man I was forced to join a union when I was working in a job I dearly loved. Even with the secret ballot in place, the intimidation by the union and the sycophantsworking with them was tremendous. Almost immediately upon the union being voted in, the productivity of our work dropped precipitously. People I had known for years cut the pace of their work activities by 25 to 33%. I was told in no uncertain terms that I needed to slow down – that I worked too hard and too fast. After a year of this, I resigned my position without a job. I was ashamed of what was happening to a company I loved. The owners of this very large business in my home town gave up as well just a few years later and sold the business.” He went on to discuss the difference of productivity in right to work states, “I once met a gentleman here in Jacksonville that owned a unionized plan in the north and a non-unionized plant in the south and in his words the difference in productivity was start. He eventually moved all the work to the south and closed the other plant.”
Filed under: EFCA, NLRB, Obama, Right to Work, SEIU | Tagged: AFL-CIO, Andy Stern, Card Check, Educate Employees About EFCA, EFCA, Employee Free Choice Act, Labor, NLRA, NLRB, Obama, Right to Work, Secret Ballot, SEIU, Teamsters, UAW, Union Elections, Unionization, Unions, United Auto Workers | Leave a comment »